Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Conservatives’ Category

Mr. Romney the charge needs to be made that the massive deficit spending of the democrats in 2008 collapsed the banking system and the evidence is in the Federal Reserve’s yearly and monthly budget records. This is what the Europeans mean when they blame America for collapsing the banking system in 2008 and the media never explains how or what Europeans mean by the accusation we collapsed or caused the world banking system to fail.

 

Barack Obama was a part of this massive deficit as a congressman in 2007 and 2008 as he is president now and has been for 3 years and 9 months. Why didn’t he fix it when he had total control by a supper majority in congress 2009 to 2010? He has no intention of fixing anything only destroying everything.

 

Here is what these federal budget documents show for 2008. $454.8 billion on deficit spending for Fiscal Year 2008 on budget deficits and an off budget deficit of $ 581.8 billion this gives us the total of $1.035 trillion for the democrats 2008 deficit.

 

First democrat budget 2008 Gross Public Debt $ 9,986.1 trillion

http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/year_spending_2008USbn_13bs1n#usgs302

 

Last republican budget 2007 Gross Public Debt $ 8,950.8 trillion

http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/year_spending_2007USbn_13bs1n#usgs302

 

The total democrat’s first year on and off budget 2008 deficit $1.035 trillion

 

The importance of why this matters is the dates because 70% of the $1.035 trillion in deficits happened just 5 months before the bank collapse not after.

 

Again this was done before the bank collapse not after and I believe it caused the world’s banks collapse of 2008 and not a result of it as the lame stream liberal news media and the democrat party has lied to the American people. If I wanted to destroy the American economy I would have done exactly what the democrats did do in their first budget as soon as they got control of congress in January of 2007.

 

Evidence and government reports are below as evidence to what I just said.

 

Democrats took control of congress in January 2007

 

Democrat’s first budget was from October 1, 2007 to September 30th 2008

 

Democrats first on budget deficit was $452 Billion on budget

 

Democrat’s first budget deficit including on and off budget total was $1.035 trillion.

 

This $1.035 trillion deficit did not include the bank bailout of $ 700 billion signed into law on October 3, 2008. this was after the close of the fiscal budget year ending on September 30, 2008 and would be in addition to the $1.035 trillion deficit. I have and am still hearing from the liberal and some conservative media that the bailout was the reason for the huge deficits but this was a special spending bill separate from the regular budget and was never all spent only about half was used and most has been paid back or will be. This is part of the political game of blame the banks for what the politicians did to give them cover and blame George W. Bush.

 

The average monthly off budget deficit of $ 581.8 billion combined with on budget deficits is what collapsed the banking system and $48.4 billion average in off budget deficits from May 2008 to September 2008 each month accumulative combined with the $454.8 billion on budget deficit spending is what dried up all available money in the banking system worldwide. Most of this deficit spending for fiscal 2008 or 70% happened in this five month period just before the 2008 bank collapse. This is not a theory it is from the records of monthly spending of Federal Reserve and CBO documents and hiding in plain sight.

 

Prior to the collapse the federal deficits were financed by banks and or governments of foreign countries. We didn’t start just printing money until after the banks collapsed in September 2008. The average on and off federal budget deficit in those 5 months before the bank collapse in 2008 was $140 billion a month and here we are it is September 2012 and the monthly on and off deficits have consistently averaged around $120 – $130 billion every month since May of 2008. All this happened after the Democrats got control of congress January 2007. None of this was done by the republicans and all of it was done by the liberal, progressive, socialist, democrats.

 

I would also like to remind readers of this – the entire prior year 2007 republican deficit was $161 billion for 1 year or $13.4 billion a month and all of a sudden it’s $161 billion every 40 days. This acted as a shock to the worlds banking systems and caused the world-wide banking system to collapse. If it was just our mortgage problems why did the whole worlds banking system fail? American private banks like Lehman Brothers failure by them self’s cannot dry up the world’s money supply but the Federal Reserve can and they did to finance the deficits from the democrats out of control spending. If it was just 1 bank that failed that wouldn’t cause the world-wide banking system to collapse either. It would take a world bank to collapse the system and that’s what the Federal Reserve is a world bank.

 

Here is the 5 monthly on budget deficits just before the 2008 bank collapse. This is just on budget deficits and not the off budgets that’s additional to these 5 months.

 

May 2008 Deficit -166 billion

June 2008 Deficit -33 billion

July 2008 Deficit -102 billion

August 2008 Deficit -112 billion

September 2008 Deficit -45 billion (the month of the world-wide bank collapse)

 

The total federal deficit for the period from May of 2008 to September 2008 was $ 458 billion. This is more than the entire on budget federal deficit for all of 2008 of $ 452 billion which means that up to that point we were on budget deficit nearly balanced and except for off budget spending we were up to that point of April 2008 and then an avalanche of all time record amounts of on budget and off budget combined federal deficit spending never before seen in history dried up all liquidity in the world banking system and left it broken to this day.

 

This is the on budget deficit for the 5 months prior to the 2008 bank collapse or $ 458 billion in just 5 months. Adding the average off budget deficits of $48.4 billion each month for those five months totals another $242 billion and the on and off budget the total is $ $700 billion. The close of the 2008 budget was September 30, 2008 and the bailout of TARP $700 billion was after the close of the 2008 budget year. Don’t let the media or anyone lie to you that the deficit was caused by the crash of the banking system as the banking system collapse was the direct result of the $1.035 trillion deficit spending of the democratic majority control of the senate and the House of Representatives. The democrats didn’t inherit this mess they caused it and the calendar and government records proves they caused it.

 

This is also the exact dollar amount of the 2008 bank bailout of TARP $700 billion and now we know the truth of how they came up with that number. Take notice this $1.035 trillion dollar 2008 budget deficit does not include the bank bailout of $700 billion that was special legislation and separate from the regular federal budgets in 2008 and in 2009. TARP was never part of the regular budget deficits it was special legislation and the banks have paid almost all of it back as of 2010. The reason the banks don’t complain is there in bed with the politicians and are happy to collapse the system and steal everyone’s money.

 

The Federal Reserve had to put back into the worlds banking system the money they took out of the world banking system prior to the bank collapse and that was caused from massive federal deficits of the liberal progressive democrats from May of 2008 to September 2008 and this budget was voted on according to constitutional law by April 2007 and this was 19 months before the collapse of the system. This was calculated and not an accident how can anyone spend $1 trillion by accident?

 

TARP dates and explanation of the bailouts.

http://useconomy.about.com/od/criticalssues/a/govt_bailout.htm

 

The total democrat’s first year on and off budget deficit ending September 2008 the very same month the world banking system collapsed was $1.035 trillion. I repeat this happened before and not after the bank collapse of September 2008 and then the democrats blamed republicans and the banks for what the Democratic Party intentionally did by April 2007. If I wanted to destroy America this is how I would do it.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CZ-4gnNz0vc

 

For those who blame Bush I say this, there has not been a federal budget produced by a president since President Eisenhower that was paid any attention by congress. As anyone who would say its Bushes fault I recommend you go back to school study some history and read the constitution as it clearly states the federal budget originates in the House of Representatives not the president’s office. The president does produce a recommended guideline for what he would like in the budget but it’s always ignored by congress. To suggest otherwise is just false information and you would be lying about the facts. Congress spends the money not the president. Read the constitution that’s what it says.

 

Take special note of the facts and the dates of this 2008 budget that was passed by April 15, 2007 or 1 year and 6 months prior to the collapse of the worlds banking system. Also the democrats did this just 4 months after taking majority control of both houses of congress in January of 2007. The normal deadline for congress to pass a budget is April 15th of each year and the budget year starts October 1 and ends September 30th if it was not intentional then what the hell was it!

 

Why hasn’t anyone in the Republican Party after 4 additional years of these intentional trillion dollars a year deficits pointed out that the Democratic Party is and has been intentionally trying to destroy America’s economy through the process of the federal budgets and deficit spending and also again using the private banking system to do it? This is being done so they can blame banks and Wall Street to give cover to the politicians.

 

The charge that all republicans running for congress and for the president’s office should make is this.

 

The democrats are trying to destroy the country economically from within the government with the massive trillion-dollar federal deficit spending year after year.

 

You have a clear choice do you want to destroy America from within or do you want America to prosper?

 

Also if the democrats are successful in their destruction of the current economic and political system the government all of its socialism goes with it the same day the existing system collapses. So the 47% on the dole will lose all government support if the system collapses. Not a scare tactic just a fact. Also the other 53% not on the dole will lose everything they have as well if the system collapses. It doesn’t matter where you put your money the collapse of the system will make you penniless if you can’t get your money out of the banks.

 

If Romney’s 47% statement wasn’t correct then why does Obama consistently pole at a 47% average? Common sense and statistics proves what Romney said was true. But the media twisted it into something he didn’t say and this is what they always do from 35 years of observation of the lame stream media. The whole Democratic Party is based on lies and if you look at their constituents is it any wonder why?

 

What the Democratic Party is doing is seditious treason by the legal description and or definition, but that part may or may not be included and left up to the person who makes that charge of treason. As the liberal progressives may try to dismiss the evidence above as a conspiracy theory and do what they do and turn the truth or facts into a fiction with the use of the word conspiracy to discredit facts.

 

The idea is to make a really big stink about all this intentional destruction of the wealth of America and let the American people decide what to do with the truth.

 

Force the liberals and the media to demand apologies and then tell all concerned I will not apologize for exposing democrats for what they have done and telling the truth about their treasonous plans to destroy America from within. (A further intentional insult) This is what Allen West does and god blesses Alan West for telling the truth. He is the bravest man I have ever come into contact with and he knows what’s going on in America and he has identified the enemy from within, the Democratic Party and the progressive communist caucus.

 

Alan West calls progressive caucus a bunch of communists. He has had the same education that I have about political economic systems and you won’t learn this in college you have to seek the truth on your own.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXi4l4q6Aho

 

Go have a look for yourself at the communist party USA website and compare that to the democrat’s website and then have a look at the progressive caucus and then the unions and anyone else in the Democratic Party they all look like or have the same stance as the communist party USA website. Well of course they do they are all communist just like Alan west tells us they are and McCarthy was right too.

 

http://www.cpusa.org/

 

Grab the democrats by the nose and kick them in the ass. (Romney Did) If you want to piss off a liberal tell them the truth. If you want to piss of a conservative tell them a lie. This tells it all about the liberal and progressive character.

 

Always attack and force the liberals to defend. Every answer or any rebuttal should be in the form of additional attacks using the truth which always turns liberal or progressives into raving maniacs and never defend or apologize always attack. In war and politics defending a position is an admission of defeat and weakness’. (General George Patton tactics)

 

We also have to grab the American people by the nose and lead them to the truth.

 

This is what happens when the democrats are in charge. This is the monthly employment report that shows charts of what happened to the unemployment rate as soon as the deficit spending of the new 2007 democrat majority got control and started to deficit spend like the crazy people they are.

 

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_01092009.pdf

 

See the charts on page 1 just under the headline. This is before the banks collapsed not after. This shows how the employment went from 4.5% while the republicans controlled congress in 2006 and how it rapidly changes after January 2007 when democrats took majority control of congress and unemployment skyrocketed up to 6.5% prior to the bank collapse not after and eventually went over 10% unemployment.

 

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_01092009.pdf

 

The more congress spent the worse the job situation got. See the charts just under the headline number. This also proves that government spending and deficit spending does the opposite of what liberal progressive democrats tell you. The more the democrat’s deficits spent the worse unemployment and the economy got.

 

The stimulus of $800 billion in 2009 did very little for permanent job creation and thus destroying the myth of government creating jobs by borrowing and spending money they don’t have. The government has borrowed or printed $7.4 trillion in just the last 5 years and the economy still stinks. As the government barrows the money it’s not in the banks anymore for the private sector to buy houses or for business to barrow for expansion and job creation.

 

I will do another page very soon showing all the specifics and naming the major players and legislation that caused the 2008 bank catastrophe and all of it comes from the Democratic Party’s legislation.

 

If you wish to contact me please leave a message. I will see it before it is posted.

 

If you are a liberal, progressive democrat don’t waste your time or mine trying to post here. I have been in the political economy for 46 years, not reading about it but living in it as a business owner and employer and your B. S. is just that to me and your lies don’t belong here.

James Garrett

 

Read Full Post »

 

1. The War on Poverty

 In their compassion for the poor, liberals earmarked $50 billion in 1964 to provide medical care, housing, cash transfers, and food subsidies to ease the plight of the disadvantaged.

 

Defiantly a failed liberal Idea

 

Hatched by social engineers who cooked up President Lyndon Johnsons great society the war on poverty spawned welfare mentality that has trapped the poor in a web of dependency, spent 16 trillion without making a dent in the poverty rate and its now higher than it’s ever been and will burn through another 10.3 trillion over the next 10 years.

 

 

 

2. The U.S. Department of Education

 

President Obama proposed a new education reform package called “Race to the Top,” which includes increased federal funding to states whose public schools improve student performance.

 

The U.S. Department of education has spent trillions of tax dollars growing a bloated top down bureaucracy but the American education still lags behind other countries. Now president Obama wants to bribe states with billions more if they give in to additional federal interference in their schools. If states show that there serious about reform says president Obama well show them the Money. I wonder-reform to what means? It sounds like more of that hope and change bull shit to me. We never got the memo on specifically what that was and look what we did get more liberal progressive failed socialism.

 

Defiantly a failed liberal Idea

 

If these ideas are so good why do liberals have to bribe people to use them?

 

 

3. The U.S. Department of Energy

 

Created in the 1970s as one of President Jimmy Carter’s bright ideas, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has seen its mission evolve from basic research and development to spending billions to commercialize technologies that aren’t yet viable—and might never be.

 

Despite funding numerous projects that never get off the ground, the U.S. Department of Energy has seen its budget grow by more than $11 billion in the last 10 years—a 76% increase!  Because our nation is looking for spending to cut, the DOE might be the place to start.  Instead of focusing on opening new sources of energy, the DOE pushes politically correct pet projects that are expensed to the American people.

 

 

Some of these ideas . . . like mood rings and polyester pants . . . are better left in the 1970s.

 

 

4. The Community Reinvestment Act

 

 

Liberals created the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) to encourage private lenders to meet the needs of borrowers in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.

 

The CRA spawned sub-prime mortgage lending, which boomed starting in the mid-1990s under President Bill Clinton. When the bubble burst, millions of sub-prime borrowers—the low-income people the CRA was created to help—found themselves owing more than their homes were worth. This set off the foreclosure cascade, tipped the economy into a prolonged recession we are still in, and plunged many families into poverty after they lost the homes they couldn’t afford but that Washington induced them to buy.

 

Defiantly a failed liberal Idea Ignoring the law of unintended consequences: It just doesn’t work.

 

 

5. ‘Comprehensive’ Immigration Reform

 

Senate liberals’ latest immigration proposal offers multiple “paths to citizenship” for foreign nationals who are in America illegally.

 

They’re touting their Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2011 as the complete and real solution to America’s immigration problems. Hoping Americans will ignore history, though, liberals’ current manipulation is as catastrophically irresponsible as the amnesty law Congress adopted in 1986, which more than quadrupled the population of people here illegally.

 

Doing the same thing and expecting a different result: That’s not going to get us anywhere.

 

 

Have you had enough of failed liberal and progressive ideas?

 

If $16 trillion hasn’t made a dent in the poverty rate, isn’t it kind of ridiculous to think another $10.3 trillion will solve the problem?

 

And if President Obama’s $800 billion stimulus didn’t create jobs, isn’t it ridiculous to think another $450 billion “so-called jobs plan” will do the trick?

 

Of course it is.

 

President Obama and his liberal cohorts in Congress, however, don’t see a problem with recycling failed liberal ideas from the past and spending the country into oblivion to enact them.

 

Liberal ideas are a lot of things: dangerous, wasteful, unconstitutional, and all part of a socialist agenda of wealth redistribution.

But it’s time to call a spade a spade: MOST LIBERAL IDEAS HAVE FAILED.

 

Liberals love to call themselves compassionate. So why do their ideas so often end up with catastrophic results on the people they’re intended to help?

 

Who is it that makes the claim that liberals and progressives are smarter then conservatives? Other stupid liberals and progressives!

 

They call themselves progressive. Truth is, though, their ideas are recycled schemes that continue to blow trillions of dollars on bloated, failed programs that take the country backward.

 

They talk about personal liberty like they invented it. But everything they do butts into every corner of your personal life and takes away personal liberty.

 

In short, many liberal ideas are recycled failures that backfire and can’t get simple concepts straight.

 

We need to send a loud-and-clear message to Congress STOP THE FAILED LIBERAL IDEAS that are bankrupting America, undermining the Constitution, and weakening the nation and lead to its destruction. Vote conservative in 2012

 

Read Full Post »

The following is a copy of Palin’s recent remarks about the Federal Reserve’s money printing.

I’m deeply concerned about the Federal Reserve’s plans to buy up anywhere from $600 billion to as much as $1 trillion of government securities. The technical term for it is “quantitative easing.” It means our government is pumping money into the banking system by buying up treasury bonds. And where, you may ask, are we getting the money to pay for all this? We’re printing it out of thin air.

The Fed hopes doing this may buy us a little temporary economic growth by supplying banks with extra cash which they could then lend out to businesses. But it’s far from certain this will even work. After all, the problem isn’t that banks don’t have enough cash on hand – it’s that they don’t want to lend it out, because they don’t trust the current economic climate.

And if it doesn’t work, what do we do then? Print even more money? What’s the end game here? Where will all this money printing on an unprecedented scale take us? Do we have any guarantees that QE2 won’t be followed by QE3, 4, and 5, until eventually – inevitably – no one will want to buy our debt anymore? What happens if the Fed becomes not just the buyer of last resort, but the buyer of only resort?

All this pump priming will come at a serious price. And I mean that literally: everyone who ever goes out shopping for groceries know that prices have risen significantly over the past year or so. Pump priming would push them even higher. And it’s not just groceries. Oil recently hit a six month high, at more than $87 a barrel. The weak dollar – a direct result of the Fed’s decision to dump more dollars onto the market – is pushing oil prices upwards. That’s like an extra tax on earnings. And the worst part of it: because the Obama White House refuses to open up our offshore and onshore oil reserves for exploration, most of that money will go directly to foreign regimes who don’t have America’s best interests at heart.

We shouldn’t be playing around with inflation. It’s not for nothing Reagan called it “as violent as a mugger, as frightening as an armed robber, and as deadly as a hit man.” The Fed’s pump priming addiction has got our small businesses running scared, and our allies worried. The German finance minister called the Fed’s proposals “clueless.” When Germany, a country that knows a thing or two about the dangers of inflation, warns us to think again, maybe it’s time for Chairman Bernanke to cease and desist. We don’t want temporary, artificial economic growth bought at the expense of permanently higher inflation which will erode the value of our incomes and our savings. We want a stable dollar combined with real economic reform. It’s the only way we can get our economy back on the right track.

 Sarah Palin and Ronald Reagan agrees with everything I have said about the self-destructive path we are on.

 Please feel free to leave a comment

Read Full Post »

A lot of people are puzzled by liberals they don’t get it they don’t understand how they think. Though I’m going to explain it to you and I’m going to tell you everything you need to know about how liberals think in two minutes. First of all its nothing but childlike emotionalism applied to adult issues. Liberals do not care if their policies work or not so you’re not going to convince them that they’re wrong by using logic because they didn’t use logic to come up with the policies they support in the first place.

 So why do liberals suport poor policy? They support policies because it makes them feel good about themselves. Because they can say they’re nice because they’re supporting a policy, it doesn’t matter if it works or not. They don’t care if it does, all they care about is making themselves feel better about what a good person they are in supporting the policy and how mean you are because you’re supporting the other policy, that’s childlike but that’s how liberals think.

 And of course they have to attack conservatives. Conservatives are actually the ones that have ideas that work. Rarely do you have debate with liberals about actual ideas. What they do instead is distract people hay Look over the there and if they don’t do that, they just attack conservatives. It doesn’t matter that the idea is good or not they’re just bad people. You should focus on that instead of whether it’s a good idea or not and if all that fails they lie. So forget about trying to convince liberals to do the right thing, forget about trying to convince liberals that their policies don’t work you’ll never get through to them that way because they think like children.

 

Read Full Post »

James Garrett

December 28, 2010

We will take a look at Conservative Beliefs and compare them to Liberal Beliefs. To show how their Beliefs conflict within liberals own beliefs and defy logic and common sense.

Conservatives believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense. Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Their policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems.

Liberals believe in governmental action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all, and that it is the duty of the State to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Believe that people are basically good. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve people’s problems.

Abortion

Conservatives believe human life begins at conception. Abortion is the murder of a human being. Nobody has the right to murder a human being. Support legislation to prohibit partial birth abortions, called the “Partial Birth Abortion Ban” Partial birth abortion is the killing of an unborn baby of at least 20 weeks by pulling it out of the birth canal with forceps, but leaving the head inside. An incision is made in the back of the baby’s neck and the brain tissue is suctioned out. The head is then removed from the uterus.

Liberals believe a fetus is not a human life. The decision to have an abortion is a personal choice of a woman regarding her own body and the government should stay out of it. Women should be guaranteed the right to a safe and legal abortion, including partial birth abortion.

My comments

I find it moronic and totally illogical that liberals do not believe in the death penalty for criminals that commit crimes like murderer rape and child molesters. But they do advocate killing the unborn totally innocent beyond a shadow of a doubt, but it’s just fine to kill babies. How does that make any sense? Why do the liberals have such a big problem with conservatives siding with life rather than the liberals siding with death and somehow they think the choice of death is better and Conservatives are just stupid and we don’t get it. What’s there to get? It is what it is, killing the unborn.

Affirmative action

Conservatives believe People should be admitted to schools and hired for jobs Based on their ability. It is unfair to use race as a factor in the selection process. Reverse-discrimination is not a solution for racism.

Liberals believe Due to prevalent racism in the past, minorities were deprived of the same education and employment opportunities as whites. We need to make up for that. Support affirmative action based on the belief that America is still a racist society. Minorities still lag behind whites in all statistical measurements of success. Also, the presence of minorities creates diversity.

My comments

It is racist to create laws that discriminate against one race to give favor to another. That is exactly what Affirmative action is a racist law. As soon as this law was passed it discriminated against who ever was given favor over another because of skin color.

Death penalty

Conservatives believe the death penalty is a punishment that if it fits the Crime it is neither ‘cruel’ nor ‘unusual’. Executing a murderer is the appropriate punishment for taking an innocent life.

Liberals believe we should abolish the death penalty. The death penalty is inhumane and is ‘cruel and unusual’ punishment. It does not deter crime. Imprisonment is the appropriate punishment. Every criminal execution risks killing an innocent person.

My comments

No Death penalty for criminals but its fine to kill babies. That is an upside down and twisted way of thinking.

The Economy

Conservatives believe the free market system, competitive capitalism, and private enterprise afford the widest opportunity and the highest standard of living for all. Free markets produce more economic growth, more jobs and higher standards of living than those systems burdened by excessive government regulation.

Liberals favor a market system in which government regulates the economy. We need government to protect us against big businesses. Unlike the private sector, the government is motivated by public interest. We need government regulation to level the playing field.

My comments

Liberals favor a market system in which government regulates the economy. This is exactly what Fascism and Nazism believes how an economic system should be run. Do some searches on these types of governments and you will see I am telling you, the truth.

Education – school vouchers

Conservatives believe School vouchers will give all parents the right to choose good schools for their children, not just those who can afford private schools. Parents who pay the taxes that fund the schools should decide how and where to educate their child.

Liberals believe School vouchers are untested experiments. We need to focus on more funding for existing public schools to raise teacher salaries and reduce class size.

My comments

The public schools have been unsuccessful since I was in school this goes back to 1972. Nothing has changed now it’s still the same in 2010 or 38 years later and nothing changed. It’s still a very low-grade of education teacher’s salaries have quadrupled and the children still graduate with a six grade education and can’t even read. It’s another repeat of the traits of a liberal to keep trying what has consistently failed and to completely ignore what does work and deny the success of anything that contradicts how they think things should be.

School vouchers are not untested and they have been around for as long as the public schools have been around. Remember all the stories of how rich kids get the best education from going to private schools. That’s not because there just rich, it’s because private run schools are just better and today there cheaper to run then public schools. It’s all about the Unions that control the schools; it’s not about a better education the liberals would like for you to believe.

The Environment

Conservatives believe Desire clean water, clean air and a clean planet, just like everyone else. However, extreme environmental policies destroy jobs and damage the economy. Changes in global temperatures are natural over long periods of time. So far, science has not shown that humans can affect permanent change to the earth’s temperature.

Liberals believe that conservatives don’t care about protecting the environment. Industrial growth harms the environment. Global warming is caused by an increased production of carbon dioxide. The U.S. is a major contributor to global warming because it produces 25% of the world’s carbon dioxide. The U.S. should enact laws to significantly reduce that amount.

My comments

Scientists have only been able to measure the ozone since 1985 first liberals screamed about the whole in the ozone then it closed up on its own and the liberals shut up. Then came Global warming being caused by man and it has proven to be a hoax. The science now proves man has little to do with global warming or global cooling. It took $47 billion in tax payer money poured into the liberal toilet to come to that false conclusion that man is the cause of global warming or climate change.

Gun control

Conservatives believe The Second Amendment gives the individual the right to keep and bear arms. Gun control laws do not thwart criminals. You have a right to defend yourself against criminals. More guns mean less crime

Liberals believe the Second Amendment gives no individual the right to own a gun, but allows the state to keep a militia (National Guard). Guns kill people. Guns kill children.

My comments

The only way you can come to the liberal conclusion that the second amendment doesn’t give the people the right to the people to bear arms is if you don’t read the part that says, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. There is no other way to translate what it plainly spells out in the plainest English possible, unless you don’t read that part. The word in the original bill of rights is separated by a comma separates the militia and the people and these rights shall not be infringed upon. I have an original in my hand as I write this. I don’t need to lie or distort the truth as the liberals always do.

Guns don’t kill people or children, people do. If you left a gun sitting on the table and no one picked it up for 1000 years it wouldn’t kill anyone until a person picked it up and used it to kill someone. I once again find the logic of the liberal missing from their statements. It is funny how liberals blame an inanimate object like a gun for the crime of killing, yet the person who picks up the gun purposely to commit an act of murder is innocent. It’s not his or her fault it’s the guns fault.

Here is the truth of it all. The liberal progressive know they can’t take over the government and install their communist constitution style government as long as Americans are armed to the teeth as we are. This is also why they hate the military so much, as they take an oath to protect the constitution. It should be obvious by the liberals stated positions on constitutional law that they don’t like it and they want to destroy it.

Health care

Conservatives believe free healthcare provided by the government (socialized medicine) means that everyone will get the same poor-quality healthcare. The rich will continue to pay for superior healthcare, while all others will receive poor-quality free healthcare from the government. Health care should remain privatized. Conservatives support healthcare spending accounts.

Liberals believe Support universal government-supervised health care. There are millions of Americans who can’t afford health insurance. They are being deprived of a basic right to healthcare

Immigration

Conservatives Support legal immigration at current numbers, but do not support illegal immigration. Government should enforce immigration laws. Oppose President Bush’s amnesty plan for illegal immigrants. Those who break the law by entering the U.S. illegally should not have the same rights as those who obey the law by entering legally. If there were a decrease in cheap, illegal immigrant labor, employers would have to substitute higher-priced domestic employees or legal immigrants,

Liberals Support illegal immigration and increasing the number of legal immigrants permitted to enter the U.S. each year. Support blanket amnesty for current illegal immigrants. Believe that regardless of how they came to the U.S., illegal immigrants deserve U.S. government financial aid for college tuition. Liberals Support Visas for spouses and children to come to the U.S. Families shouldn’t be separated. Illegal immigrants do the jobs that Americans do not want to do.

Conservatives know these facts

In the last debate on Illegal immigration only 18% of Americans wanted amnesty for illegal aliens and 82% were against it. The liberal beliefs would open the flood gates to millions pouring over the border to take advantage of the amnesty. This has been done two times before and that’s what the result was. This also allows the extended families numbering as many as 48 million more people legally coming into the country. Here is the big problem with allowing 48 million more people into the country. The larger the labor forces the cheaper the wages of all people. It works the same as demand and supply. History proves the larger the work force available to employers, the cheaper the wages that have to be paid. Don’t tell me this is a myth because I have firsthand experience and I have worked with Department of immigration on this problem before it became part of homeland security. This is another example of the liberals defying common sense and it’s as if they want to do everything possible to damage the country and its people in every way possible. Conservatives and the people are the enemy from my observations of liberal democrat actions for more than 40 years

Religion

Conservatives believe the phrase “separation of church and state” is not in the Constitution. For a very good reason it’s not in the Constitution. The First Amendment to the Constitution states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” This prevents the government from establishing a national church. However, it does not prevent God from being acknowledged in schools and government buildings. Oppose the removal of symbols of Christian heritage from public and government spaces. Government should not interfere with religion and religious freedom.

The liberal supports the separation of church and state. Religious expression has no place in government. Support the removal of all references to God in public and government spaces. Religion should not interfere with government.

My comments

The very wording of the constitution says religion is allowed in public. The bill of rights specifically says Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of a religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech. By prohibiting religion in public you are prohibiting religion and the freedom of speech. That would mean the liberal idea of prohibiting religion or prayer in public is against the law and is a direct violation of the bill of rights.

The phrase “separation of church and state” is not in the Constitution. That is just a fact. The liberal keep insisting it’s there but it’s not. The reason for that is they live in there fantasy land of just make it up as we go. They think you’re stupid and won’t check it for yourself and hoping you will believe that there telling you the truth. It clearly states in the constitution that no laws shall be passed that restrict religious freedom it is stated even in public. Separation of church and state is no were in the constitution, but liberals constantly lie to people and say it is.

Same-sex marriage

Conservatives believe Marriage is between one man and one woman. Opinions differ on support for the creation of a constitutional amendment establishing marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Believe that requiring citizens to sanction same-sex relationships violates moral and religious beliefs of millions of Christians, Jews, Muslims and others who believe marriage is the union of a man and a woman.

Liberals believe marriage should be legal for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender couples to ensure equal rights for all. All individuals, regardless of their sex, have the right to marry. Believe that prohibiting same-sex citizens from marrying denies them of their civil rights. Opinions differ on whether this issue is equal to civil rights for African-Americans

My comment.

Liberals and progressives Democrats are a very sick group of people and I suggest they all see a psychologist and get counseling.

Social Security

Conservatives believe the current Social Security system is in serious financial trouble. Changes are necessary because the U.S. will be unable to maintain the current system it in the future. Support proposal to allow a portion of Social Security dollars withheld to be put into an account chosen by the individual, not the government.

Liberals generally oppose change to the current Social Security system. Opinions vary on whether the current system is in financial trouble. Changing the current system will cause people to lose their Social Security benefits. Support a cap on Social Security payments to the wealthy.

Taxes

Conservatives support lower taxes and a smaller government. Lower taxes create more incentive for people to work, save, invest, and engage in entrepreneurial endeavors. Money is best spent by those who earn it.

Liberals Support higher taxes and a larger government. High taxes enable the government to do well and create jobs. We need high taxes for social welfare programs, to provide for the poor. We can’t afford to cut taxes.

My comments

Liberals support higher taxes to create government jobs that become an ever-growing burden on the American tax payer. Government doesn’t create wealth they destroy it. 230 years of American economic history proves this to be true. If you believe otherwise your information is flawed. I suggest you do some research on the subject of economics. You won’t find the truth at a liberal website or a liberal blog. There information is also flawed and it’s deliberate.

Liberals say we need high taxes for social welfare programs, to provide for the poor. Look at the section below on welfare. If we grow the economy and create jobs for these poor people they won’t need welfare.

United Nations (UN)

Conservatives believe the UN has repeatedly failed in its essential mission to preserve world peace. The wars, genocide and human rights abuses of the majority of its member states and the UN’s failure to stop them prove this point. History shows that the United States, not the UN, is the global force for spreading freedom, prosperity, tolerance and peace. The U.S. should never subvert its national interests to those of the UN.

Liberals believe the United States has a moral and a legal obligation to support the United Nations. The UN can be effective in promoting peace and human rights. The U.S. should not have acted in Iraq without UN approval. The U.S. should submit its national interests to the greater good as defined by the UN.

My comments

This is just another example of the liberal wanting to keep trying failed systems. The United Nations has never been effective in any way. They can’t even distribute food to starving people without stealing billions in food aid that the United States paid for they can’t be trusted to do anything humanitarian or peacekeeping. Conservatives believe the United Nations is a waste of valuable resources and should not be consulted about any matters of importance.

Bill Clinton once put our troupes under the United Nations flag in Bosnia and that is a direct violation of the constitution. This is just more proof the liberals have no respect for the constitution as they continually support any thing that violates constitutional law and try to make new rules as they go that circumvent or violates the constitution. Shame on them, these are a sick bunch of people who still support and trust this group of thugs.

War on terror or terrorism

Conservatives believe the world toward which the Militant Islamists strive cannot peacefully co-exist with the Western world. In the last decade, Militant Islamists have repeatedly attacked Americans and American interests here and abroad. The terrorists must be stopped and destroyed.

Liberals believe 9/11 was caused by America’s arrogant foreign policy. America needs to stop angering other countries. The threat posed by terrorism is exaggerated by President Bush for his own political advantage.

My comments

Sure it’s our fault by the liberal’s way of thinking, it’s always our fault. The perfect example of this attitude is president Obama going around the world apologizing for America everywhere he goes. He is a disgrace to the country and his attitude about the United States is a form of seditious treason. Conservatives have the opposite point of view based on facts as we see it and as it is in reality not in fantasy land. America has done far more good than bad. America has become the policeman of the world and what will they all do when we are gone?

Welfare

Conservatives Oppose long-term welfare. We need to provide opportunities to make it possible for poor and low-income workers to become self-reliant. It is far more compassionate and effective to encourage a person to become self-reliant, rather than keeping them dependent on the government for money.

Liberals support welfare. We need welfare to provide for the poor. Conservatives oppose welfare because they are not compassionate toward the poor. We have welfare to bring fairness to American economic life. Without welfare, life below the poverty line would be intolerable.

My comments

Welfare has destroyed the black American family and keeps those who are poor people poor. They keep voting for their pay checks by voting for the liberal, progressive democrats. There has been no improvement in the lives or standard of living of the poor until they get out of the government social systems. It’s another example of liberals wanting to continue failed programs even after 50 years of complete failure. After welfare reform 12 million people got off the welfare programs and no one starved to death. They simple just went out and got a job. These laws were reversed by Barak Obama in February of 2010. Being poor should be intolerable so people strive to get out of that situation. If you make them comfortable in their poverty most people will stay in it forever.

It seems to me that the liberal progressive democrats represent every social problem in our country. The liberals have created many programs to supposedly fix these problems and every one of their ideas has failed. But yet they consistently want to keep on trying these failed social systems. That’s Albert Einstein description of insanity and this is a conservatives take as well. The liberals own beliefs and their actions are in conflict with their stated beliefs. Liberals say we want to be the best we can be. We want as few people suffering as possible. Yet they keep on doing things that conflict with those goals and create an even bigger and ever-growing problem. This is all a distraction from matters of more importance and it’s a liberal tactic, while they change other things we aren’t paying attention to. This is how they got control over all three branches of government.

If you want to know what this will all lead to in the next 2 years you need to read the book 2012. Republicans winning the election in November of 2010 wont change the path we have been on for the last 100 years. We will soon have to pay the price for liberal, progressive ideology. The price will be more than anyone can afford to pay.

2012 What's really going to happen in 2012

Read Full Post »

In the next 18 months there will be many very obvious signs that everyone will be able to see and follow our currencies demise. The evidence will be found in the two most noticeable commodities we purchase every week and that’s the price of Gasoline and food. While the governments’ bureau of labor and statistics is telling us we have no inflation reported to be 1.1% the cost of Gasoline and food will be skyrocketing upward.

 In the last report out December 15, 2010 the headline number on inflation came out at .8% or 8/10 of one percent. These numbers are calculated on a monthly bases and it seems no one ever looks at what’s in the reports. Here is the increased cost of the two most important items in America. The CPI report shows the last 12 month gasoline has increased 9.5%. Then if we look at food over the 12 month period we get 1.4% increase in price. The total of all items in all categories clams’ inflation is running at 1.1% per year. I think we all know that something is not right with these numbers. The cost of gasoline in just the last 3 months is up 20% where I live and I have seen that in other areas of the country is a lot higher.

 But the November Producer Price Index (PPI) for finished goods surged 0.8 percent is doubles most economists’ estimates. Moreover, the inflation is not stemming just from rising energy prices. Overall, the cost of food rose 1 full percentage point in November, which is equivalent to 12 percent annual inflation rate. Egg prices led the way higher, jumping 23 percent in November, while the price of fruit jumped an astounding 14 percent. Think these are one-time, freak price jumps? Think again, because since the first of this month… the price of corn is up more than 3 percent … coffee is up more than 8 percent … sugar is up 8.49 percent … oats are up nearly 6 percent … while cotton prices are up more than 16 percent — all of this in just 15 days!

 The consumer price index hasn’t started jumping yet. But just like night follows day, it will as companies pass on higher wholesale costs. The Fed SAID it would continue its QE2 policy, saying it would “promote a stronger pace of economic recovery” … But that reckless policy is driving interest rates skyward! In fact, two-year Treasury yields have doubled in 29 trading days. Five-year yields have surged 102 basis points, or 1.02 percentage points, while 10-year yields just hit a seven-month high. Thirty-year municipal bond yields soared to a 16-month high, as thirty-year mortgage rates jumped to the highest since the tail end of the spring home buying season.

 So not only is the Fed failing to promote recovery by driving borrowing costs down It’s actually hindering the recovery by driving costs up. Yet in the Fed’s fantasy world, everything is peachy keen! With interest rates rising and the Fed continuing to print money and buy bonds, despite a zero percent success rate so far, here comes hyperinflation!

 The price of gasoline has gone from under $2.50 a gallon to $3.00 that is a 20% increase in just 3 months. I do my own shopping and I believe food has gone up more than 1.4% in the last year. Any way my point is what we really need to buy every week is climbing at a much greater rate than the reports show. This is nothing new as I have notice this to be the case all my years of running a business. But in the following months because of the intentional devaluation of the dollar, the cost of petroleum products and food will increase as the dollar devalues against all other currencies. This is what happens when a country intentionally devalues its currency. Ben Bernanke has said we need to create some inflation because it’s to low at 1.1%.

 So here is what’s taking place right now and it’s the truth. I will explain how this will get out of control real fast. We will start with what the news media is referring to as QE-2 which translated means quantitative easing. The amount of money they are going to print or digitize is $600 Billion. Bernanke claims the purpose is to create liquidity in the banking system. The true reason is to finance the federal deficit of $110 billion a month. There are just moving digits from one Colum of a computer program and moving the digits to another Colum, there not even printing the money anymore. This has to be added to the federal deficit spending for all of 2008 and up to the end of 2010 and that dollar amount is around $3.9 trillion. Now we are adding $600 Billion for a total of $4.5 trillion. The money is getting into the streets with monthly government spending on entitlement programs.

 This QE-2 money will run out buy April of 2011, so what happens next? QE-3 will be another $600 billion and Ben Bernanke said this would be the case if needed and it will be needed. There’s no end in sight with the federal budget deficits of 1.55 trillion for 2011. That’s $129 billion on average added each month to finance the gap between government revenue and government spending. The QE-3 will run out by September 2011. So what comes next? QE-4, 5 and 6 there is no end in sight.

 Why does this matter and why should you care? As the Federal Reserve keeps propping up federal spending deficits over the short period of the next 18 months we will destroy what confidence is left in our paper currency. This means the prices of crude oil from were ever we do import it from will continue to rise with the continued intentional devaluation of the dollar. We import 72% of all the crude oil we use and we are not in control of the price. American oil companies only control 3% of the world oil supplies. Well why does this matter? For every dollar a gallon the price goes up it takes $27 billion each month out of Americans pockets they would otherwise spend on something else. We are not buying additional product we are just paying a lot more for it. $4.00 a gallon gasoline by July of 2008 is part of what caused the last recession or the one we are still in that lead to a worldwide bank collapse. That recession started in December of 2007. If you find a chart of the price of gasoline and a chart for unemployment as the cost of gas went up so did unemployment. They move in lockstep for the following reasons.

 On a yearly base $1 in additional cost to a gallon of gas is about $300 billion that goes missing for other purchases. I believe the threshold for decline in other economic activity due to the price of gas is $2.50 a gallon and once we get above that we start to lose jobs because all that money goes missing. There is also the secondary affect the higher price of crude pushes up the cost of food and all other energy related categories. There is also another problem and its ethanol that is added to the gasoline. This comes from corn and corn is also the main food use for cattle chickens and all farm animals. As we burn ethanol up we are forcing the cost up for farmers to feed their animals and this has a direct affect on the cost of all our food supply on top of the higher price from the higher cost of crude oil.

 In 2011 we can look for much higher Gasoline prices and much higher food prices. It will look like this by the end of 2011, gasoline will double to $5.00 a gallon and food will be up about 30%. The Bureau of labor and statistics will be telling us we have just 5% inflation. This is exactly what they were telling us in July of 2008 when gasoline was $4.00 a gallon in most parts of the country and in Crazy left coast California gasoline was over $5.00 a gallon. Most of the price increase in 2008 was from January to July or in just 7 months. That was all from speculation in the commodities market, not from the intentional devaluation of the dollar.

 The inflation of the currency has a quantitative number of jobs losses that will come from the money gone missing from the higher gas prices. Based on my numbers and numbers from the department of labor, I have calculated that for every $1.00 a gallon or $27 billion each month the job cost is 183,828 jobs that disappear with the money. On yearly bases that is 2,205,936 lost jobs and this doesn’t count all the income lost from the jobs incomes that no longer exist that will forces even more job losses. This is already happening in October and November of 2010 the last two unemployment reports have shown in the body of the report not the headline number, we have lost 503,000 jobs from the total number of jobs in the economic system. This coincides with the rising price of crude oil as it has crept up for the last three months. The headline numbers were positive, but just like all government reports they have diluted them in such a way the true state of the economy doesn’t show up until 3 to 6 months later, if it shows up at all. The interior of the reports show a decline in the number of people with jobs was negative 330,000 for October and 173,000 for November. So get ready for a wild ride as prices go back to $4.00 and then to $5.00 by the end of 2011

 The higher cost of food has the same results as the higher price of gas. Food has to be replenished on weekly bases we eat it and it disappears and if it cost more for the same amount of product the money just disappears. The money doesn’t exist anymore to purchase other products and the economy slows even more and even more jobs are lost. Currently the unemployment rate is at 9.8 % for November 2010. I expect at the very least we will lose at least another 6 million jobs by the end of 2011 if the above scenario plays out. This will put the unemployment rate at around 13% to 14% by early 2012, which will be catastrophic. The value of the dollar will have its ups and downs because of Europe’s economic problems but the long term direction over the next 18 months will be the same, a severe devaluation of the dollar. So what happens next?

 If you want to know the whole story on how we got into this position and were all this will take us and our country you have to buy my book called 2012: what’s really going to happen in 2012. There are no prophecies in the book, it’s not about wizards or any hocus pocus codes. It’s about sound economic practices that we have ignored within our own governments policies and how the very government we expect to protect the country has planned our demise and why. I show the proof based on simple math, a little common sense and the current history of the last 10 years to get us right where we are. 

http://tiny.cc/ns56s

2012 What's really going to happen in 2012

Read Full Post »

I knew for the last 30 years the democrats wanted to do what they are doing today. Little by little liberal, progressive democrats over the very long period of time of 100 years have been changing the country slowly to socialism. I watch Glenn because he affirms what I already know to be true, but he teaches a lot more in detail and it’s like going back to school when he gets out his black boards. I hear he has three now.

 I wrote a book 20 years ago that predicted what is going on today in our politics and our economy. We are making the final changes to a proven failed political and economic system of socialism. Anyone who says that Europe’s doing OK needs to take a better look. Europe’s economy has been in a constant state of recession for over 40 years. Their normal unemployment rate is always above 10%. There’s very little industry because of supper high taxes on business. In France their two biggest industries are wine and cheese and that’s not a joke, those are the facts. The people who do work in the private sector are taxes at 70% when adding their payroll taxes and there sales taxes on products. For example they have a $5.00 a gallon gasoline tax to pay for there socialized healthcare system.

 Here is our big problem, we can’t afford anywhere near a 70% taxes and pay our existing bills to. Europe started out as socialist countries after the Second World War. They were rebuilt under the socialist economic model. We are structured under a capitalist model and were charging to hard left socialist. The country is already bankrupt. Where is all the money going to come from to support all these new social programs as we go all the way to a European style of socialism? I have done the math and the moneys just not there, even with the higher taxes included in all these new programs. It’s just not economically sustainable from the start.

We don’t have to wait 4 years to see if it works. The negative economic effects from the new socialized healthcare will be Immediate. In 2011 the new healthcare insurance premiums will have a direct negative effect on the economy. There are 180 million Americans with paid health insurance coverage. Everyone I have talked to has to pay an increased premium of $1,200.00 to $3,600.00 each person on their policy. Takeing the lower amount of $1,200.00 and multiplying that times 180 million Insured people will cost Americans $216 Billion in 2011. We are not getting more of a product or service we are just paying a lot more for the same thing. This is the definition of inflation, when costs go up the money disappears into tin air.

 It’s not so much about the cost of the socialism today as it’s about the confidence of the American people. Even before the jobs are lost and the taxes are taken to support the new socialism. Then we also have to consider the confidence of our foreign trading partners, will they lose confidence in our currency? Will they be able or willing to purchase our debt bonds to finance all our existing and all our new socialism when they know they can’t afford their own? I say no they won’t buy our debt bonds, since China has already dumped $50 Billion back into the market. There is a trick the chinese could use to combat our money printing and your going to love this. I expect if they do continue in the future to purchase our debt they may play the same game we are. The chinese government has a printing press like we do and they can print or digitize their currency to purchase our phony money with their phony money. This could offset their looses in the face value of our debt bonds and at the same time get paid interest on their phony money.

 Everything Glenn Beck says will come true and we only have to wait 2 years and by 2012 we will see it all unfold. Glenn has 10 million followers on the radio and up to 3.5 million on Fox news. That compares to MSNBC 350 to 500 Thousand. For the nut job people say Glen Beck is, he has as many 10 times as many followers as other like kind news programs. MSNBC says it’s because Americans are stupid and that could also be part of why there ratings are so low. I love Glenn Beck’s message.

2012 What's really going to happen in 2012

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »